Archive for November, 2006

I refuse to go with the easy joke here BSS

While fighting against evil, I pledged to keep the world updated on what Britney is doing with her life. At the time, she was unmarried and mildly sane. And her private parts were…private…

On to the links!

1. Mmmkay, as you may or may not know, Britey moved from a precious flower this week, to a graceful woman. Any by that, I mean, had a paparazzi shot of her crotch. And, thanks to the wonder that is Tailrank, I don’t have to talk about that one, isolated incident, ever again.

2. Oh. Crap. And there’s more…ugh…

3. Instead of endlessly posting links to Britney’s privates, let’s just call it a BSS, shall we? Please? Please?

4. For the love of all that is Holy (quick! reword!) for all that is…uh…left to the imagination…just be over with!

Lookie: The Britney Tracker keeps you up-to-date on what else the poor girl keeps on doing to herself.

Dallas Clark for President

The videos and Rooster Teeth post done gone. After Dallas Clark got injured in the Eagles game (how’d that happen?), the boys took their videos down.

It started out, innocently enough, the Rooster Teeth children made a commercial for EA Sports’ Madden 2007. Here’s the spot:

However, nobody asked the man, the myth, the legend Dallas Clark what he thought about the advertisement. Because of this, he was not pleased:

“Everyone is talking about my face and my grunting and the noises I make,” Clark said. “It sounds like I’m dying.

“I want to know why the people picked me. If they come and ask me, ‘Hey, we’re going to make you look bad, is that OK?’ (but) they didn’t ask me.”

No, Dallas, they didn’t. For shame, Rooster Teeth, for shame.

But what’s this? EA Sports didn’t use the actual version of the commercial? They used a slightly modified version? Say it isn’t so!

And there you have it folks: that’s science, right there. Read the apology letter from the Rooster Teeth boys here. And, one more thing…

DALLAS CLARK FOR PRESIDENT!

Get OmniWeb before it’s expensiver

Yes, I paid for a browser. Trust me, after getting free Netscape Navigator after Navigator, I never thought I’d have to pay for a browser. But I did.

And, I love this darn thing. It makes Safari usable, insofar as it’s also built on WebKit, yet doesn’t have the same nagging quirks of crashitude and javascript hate, at least not that I can’t recover from. The window saves are the best thing that’s happened to me in a while.

The reason I’ve staved off a purchase before was the $30 price tag. No only do I not like paying for a browser, I don’t like paying $30 for one. However, for the next couple of days, you can get it for only $9.95! Hurry! Sale ends in December!

Unless they see how many folks buy it now, and keep the price that low.

Which would be cool.

If they make it free, however, we’re gonna throw down.

I’m still smarting about that OmniMarmoset vaporware.

Add some humanity to del.icio.us daily blog posting

To be honest, this is something difficult you need to do, because there’s nothing more confusing than a list of links with no explanation. I’ve tried to add some basic conceptual basis to the With a linkness page, but I never could get it to the daily posts. Not that I cared, I tried to keep them buried, for the most part. The only reason I put them on this site was to make the links more accessible.

However, as much as I’ve worked to make it easy for people to figure out what they’re looking at, sometimes it’s just not fully apparent. So, using a couple of template tags and some PHP logic, I added some extra self-promotional MacStansbury magic to each of my del.icio.us blog postings. And you can too, if you’re not faint of heart, and don’t mind messing with the inner workings of your template tags.

A couple of caveats:
1. This is for WordPress, but it could easily be ported over to Movable Type or anything else with a template tag system that allows for if:else.
2. This is impossible to use in Blogger - there’s just no category support in this manner.
3. You’ll need a dedicated category strictly for del.icio.us daily blog posting.

I won’t lie to you, I came up with none of this myself. All I did was put some template tags together, and hoped it would work. It did, like this:

First, you get your category ID you’ve set up to publish the del.icio.us bookmarks. Trust me, if you don’t have a dedicated category set up, this won’t work, as you’ll get the extra stuff on every page. That ID (you can find out what it is on the Manage>Categories in your admin) is what you stick in this code I lifted borrowed from the WordPress Codex:

<?php if ( in_category('category_id') ): ?>
<p>Here's where all the magic happens</p>
<?php endif; ?>

Inside your template, you’ll have a page that calls the loop. Some templates actually call this file “theloop.php” for some odd reason. Wherever it is, say index.php or theloop.php or any other file name, somewhere you’ll find this:

<?php the_content(); ?>

That would be what you want directly underneath your code. Or, in my case, on either side of it. Here’s a sample of what it might look like:

<?php if ( in_category('6') ): ?>
<p><img id="image127" src="http://macstansbury.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/07/delicious-42px.gif" alt="del.icio.us" style="float:left"/>Powered by <a href="http://del.icio.us/MacStansbury">del.icio.us <a href=”http://del.icio.us/settings”>daily blog posting</a> I use for <a href=”http://macstansbury.com/linkness”>With a linkness.<br />Use the <a href=”http://del.icio.us/help/for”>for:macstansbury tag to send me links.<br />Here\’s the latest set of links.</p>
<?php endif; ?>

<?php the_content(); ?>
<?php if ( in_category('6') ): ?>
<p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://del.icio.us/feeds/js/networkbadge/macstansbury?nwcount;fancount"></script></p>
<?php endif; ?>

Don’t forget to add the paragraph tags, or you’ll get unpredictable results.

That will give you (roughly) what I’ve used on the posts in the del.icio.us backup category. Compare that to how the guy who showed me there was daily blog posting in the first place, Steve Rubel, with his daily links. Now you’ll have the option of either going with the extravagant MacStansbury lifestyle, with bells and whistles, or with the old-school, down-low style, sans all the jibber-jabber.

Breaking addictions, and growing simpler

I love the internet - too much, in fact. I could waste days on end just playing around on it. Last week I figured I’d need an amicable divorce from it, just to feel human again.

As it turns out, my hiatus lasted a week, but it could’ve been more, as I intended to take the entire month of December off. It was an experiment, a way to find out if I could last an entire month without posting something. Seven days appears to be my maximum.

For those of you following along, yes, this has something to do with my GTD app. You see, when I was writing up some tasks, I have a maddeningly long list of things yet to accomplish. However, today I decided to get some of the weeds out of the flower-beds, if you will. I have a problem with the footer, so I needed to get that worked out.

Then, the old habits kicked in, and I was experimenting, messing around, and generally learning new things about how WordPress, CSS, and human nature collide. You can see the handiwork in the footer, but it was less about making it easier to get around the site, and more about making things easier to manage. Today I put in these in the left-most column:

WITH A LINKNESS
SYNDICATION
ARCHIVES
NEWS
CONTACT FORM
COLOPHON
PODCAST

“Fine,” you’re thinking, “that’s rather simple. Wasn’t that stuff there before?” Yes, yes it was. The problem being, it didn’t look simple. It looked like a giant list of things to click on. I made them bigger, more spaced out, and simpler. The giant whitespace beside it doesn’t hurt to draw it to your attention, does it? See how making something less complicated sometimes helps you use it?

That was the key to John’s GTD app. There aren’t endless tags and commands for you to use. Just the few, and just enough to get it to work. Then, when you’ve got it working, you either complete them or you don’t. It’s as simple as humanly possible - yes or no.

Thankfully, this will complete a myriad set of goals I’ve had for weeks, and will allow me to concentrate on something I haven’t in a while: the outside. Now if I could just remember what you’re supposed to do out there, then I’d be set.

Put the Technorati Link Count Widget on your blog

Is it just me, or is Technorati just terrible at reminding people what you can do with your blog? Case in point, the Link Count Widget. I might remember it from somewhere, but I’ve never seen in on people’s sites, and I’m not reminded of it when I log into my account.

I subscribe to the Text* Snippents feed, and you’ll see good code coming out of there every once in a while. Today, I saw this code for Textpattern. Being the curious sort, I tried to figure out how to do it in WordPress. Turns out, I didn’t need to go through all that effort, as Technorati already put in on a page, ready for my copy-and-pasting ways.

And, in all candor, I sorta remember this, from a while ago, but not very well. It’s not like this is a new tool, but it’s certainly more subtle, complete, and usable than the Get Sphere’d tool. Then again, Sphere is still trying to find its way, while Technorati should have this all worked out.

To put the Link Count Widget on your blog, you copy and paste the code on the Link Count Widget page and put it in your template. Really simple, and then you get to see if someone else is indexed by Technorati linking to your page.

You can see it on this page in the footer at “View blog reactions.”

Google, lemme tell you about rel=”nofollow”

Google supposedly follows the “nofollow” convention to keep from following links to other places. With that in your tag (e.g. a), Google and other search engines are not supposed to follow the links. I found out that’s not working.

I was using the WP-Print plugin to produce an easy way to print posts. You clicked the “Print this post” link, and you get a nice-looking page free of other things you don’t need, like the fat footer on the bottom of the page, or the other post meta data, like who wrote it (duh) or things of that nature. Just the stuff you need from the post, the post itself.

Life was going well, until I found out I was being punished by Google. If I didn’t have the correct coding in the print tag, I’d be producing PageRank injuring duplicate posts. That’s the reason the archive pages just use archives now, that evil Search Engine Optimization, the Holy Grail of linkinology.

Luckily, GaMerZ put in the “nofollow” attribute to make sure Google and other search engines would stay clear of the duplicates, right? Right? Right?

Look down the page, and you’ll see the web addresses ending in .htmprint and .htmemail can only be reached by going through the rel="nofollow" links. This makes the code that GaMerZ put in there practically useless, SEO-ly speaking. He followed the rules, Google didn’t, and who gets punished for it? Me.

Yeah, Google, might wanna check that “nofollow” thing out.

Friday Spoilers: Casino Royale

Spoiler Alert!
This is just to warn you. I will be giving out advanced notice of something that happens in a movie that you won’t know unless I tell you, or you see the movie. Or you’ve…oh, I can’t even snark on this…

This week’s movie is called Casino Royale and it’s about a casino that’s all royal. Okay, it’s yet another James Bond, 007, movie. And, since the franchise is getting a little long in the tooth, let’s figure out a way to spice it up.

How to spice it up.

Spice it up.

Hmm.

What in the world to the kids like these days, and we can stick in there?

Hmm.

I’ve got it! NUDITY!!! That’s much better than coming up with movies we could give a crap about! Nakedness, that’ll get the butts in seats!

Does anybody even care about this series anymore? “We’ll just slap some skin in there, as much as we can and keep the PG-13.” They call that marketing genius. Makes me not even to want to spoil it (like I could).

So, here’s the spoiler:

I seem to recall something about nudity. Not clear on what it was.

Have a great weekend, everybody!

A simple “Digg this!” code for WordPress

You see the buttons seemingly everywhere. I’m not one for lots of social media buttons and whatnot, and I used Sociable for about 10 seconds before deciding it wasn’t worth the effort. I just don’t like endless buttons. Simple, that’s my claim to fame. And uncrowded, too.

The thing that turned me off of Digg was just how large it has become. That, and the zillions of buttons, tabs, and WordPress widgets I see everywhere, enticing you to “Digg this!” I figured it was just the Diggian Overlords impressing their will on the masses.

I saw a friend who had her links messed up, and I wondered what she was doing wrong. I had no idea there wasn’t an official way of doing this in the wild, so I figured I’d figure out how to do it myself.

Here’s the code (unlike usual, I’m sticking it in copy-and-paste-friendly text box):

That’ll give you that neat “Digg this!” text link you can stick anywhere in your template. See how you can add some extra image-y goodness to it from Christian Spanring. Movable Type version from Phin.

Bigger fonts, better reading

Yesterday, I read something from Information Architects, and it made me challenge my own desires. For the most part, I like my fonts small and my whitespace filled with buttons and dohickeys. 7px body type is just too big when you’re trying to get in 18,000 blog banners.

To be honest, the big fonts just don’t appeal to me. However, readability is, and after I switched to Helvetica Neue, I knew I’d have to do something. Helvetica Neue is thinner and taller than Verdana, so the same font size wouldn’t be the same. While (12px) would look large enough for most people using Verdana, Helvetica Neue will appear thinner and smaller.

To keep it legible, I’d have to crank up the size. When I first put in K2, I didn’t like the larger font sizes, to I retooled it to my own, small version. Unfortunately, my personal preference doesn’t help people who are vision impaired, or just don’t like to sit 2 inches in front of the screen. To remedy that, I bumped up the font: 62.5%* size from 1.1em to 1.3em. Not drastic, but it helps.

Here’s detail views at how it’s changed:

Before, with the tiny letters.   After, with the bigger letters, more whitespace

I’m still tweaking things, trying to get the posts to their supposedly necessary 10-15 words per line, while trying to keep me from going crazy with the Web 2.0 giganto-fonts.

*font: 62.5% resets your font size so that 1em is the same as 10px. This makes it easier for web designers to figure out how tall the fonts will appear on different browsers, and to make it so that 1.1em is just 11 pixels, just like in a word processing program.